To think like a lawyer, you have to practice shifting your mind into the ways a lawyer thinks and reads law.
( Read more... )Introduction
- Legal research is nonlinear
- To be ale to do legal research, you need to be able to read and interpret:
- Cases, statues, legal jargon, court systems and their hierarchies
Legal Research Structure:
- Plan
- Log
- Product
1. Plan
- Identify key issues, main facts, jurisdiction, potential search terms, and legal terminology
2. Log
- Keep records and notes of your legal research
- “I tried…” or “I keep seeing x case…”
- Keep your log detailed in regards to your search queries, thought processes, results, and failures.
- Record all findings while noting new questions
3. Product
Legal memos are informative and objective, while briefs are arguing a case
Legal memo breakdown:
- Question presented: Clear statement of legal issues
- Brief answer: Concise summary of case and legal issues
- Facts of the case
- Legal analysis: How laws, cases, and legal rules apply
- Conclusion: Final answers and recommendations on next steps
Hierarchy of Authorities:
Sources:
- Primary: Thee law
- Secondary: blogs from attorneys, treatises, essentially anything that helps explain the law that isn’t the law itself
The Hierarchy of Authority:
- Level one (most power): The United States Constitution
- Has mandatory or binding authority over the levels below (or courts have to follow what they say)
- Creates the Federal government
- Level two: Federal law
- This is because of the supremacy clause in the United States Constitution
- Has mandatory authority over the levels below
- Level three: The Supreme Court
- Interprets United States Constitution and Federal law
- Highest court in the United States
- Has mandatory authority over the levels below
- Level four: Court of appeals = circuit
- Has persuasive authority over courts outside of it's jurisdiction (or a legal source that a court can use to support a decision, but is not required to follow)
- Level five (least power): Trial court = district
- Has persuasive authority (or a legal source that a court can use to support a decision, but is not required to follow)